Search for: "CCH II, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2016, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
It also noted that a failure to report a Category II or Category III violation would itself be a Category II violation. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm by Howard Knopf
     The US Court’s stance on contributory infringement is consistent with the Supreme Court of Canada’s position on “authorization” in the 2004 decision in CCH Canadian v Law Society of Upper Canada, in which the SCC held that:…a person does not authorize infringement by authorizing the mere use of equipment that could be used to infringe copyright. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
The state high court said the agency erred in finding it dispositive that they did not actually provide services to other companies, despite ample evidence that they had independent business enterprises (Southwest Appraisal Group, LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 7:49 am by Joy Waltemath
For example, in Iowa, an internal complaint by an assisted living facility’s marketing director that her employer was forging required staff training documents advanced a clearly defined and well-recognized public policy involving the welfare of dementia patients expressed in both the Iowa Code and administrative rules (Dorshkind v Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, LLC, August 2, 2013). [read post]